Model Context Protocol (MCP):
Architecture, business value and secure implementation for companies
Many teams are experimenting with AI, but the real bottleneck remains the connection to real data and processes. Without a standardized interface, a patchwork of proprietary integrations quickly emerges, which are expensive, involve risks and remain difficult to maintain.
The model Context Protocol, MCP for short, addresses precisely this gap. It provides an open, vendor-independent protocol that securely connects AI applications with data sources, tools and workflows.
For decision-makers, this means: shorter timeto-value, measurable ROI and a governance-architecture that works with AI Act, GDPR and internal control systems.
5 key takeaways
- MCP creates standards where previously special solutions dominated.
Instead of developing individual interfaces for each AI model and system, MCP establishes a universal protocol and thus reduces integration effort and technical debt. - Business value is created through reusability and governance.
Once developed, MCP servers can be used in different contexts, auditable, secure and with clear control over data access and functionalities. - Compliance becomes structurable, even under the AI Act and GDPR
MCP helps to document data flows, limit access rights and make processes traceable – a decisive step towards AI governance. - MCP complements existing architectures, it does not replace them.
In combination with RAG, classic APIs and existing platforms, MCP becomes the connecting layer that brings together expertise, context and transparency. - MCP works best when you start small, clear and controlled.
Instead of connecting all systems immediately, we recommend a specific use case with a limited data space and a measurable goal. In this way, governance, security and added value can be built up step by step – with minimal risk and a maximum learning curve.
What is the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and why now?
The Model Context Protocol is an open standard that provides AI systems with a uniform language for accessing external data and functions. The frequently used analogy “USB-C for AI” gets to the heart of the matter: instead of building a special solution for each connection, applications use MCP to connect to standardized servers that provide capabilities and context.
This transforms large language models from purely static knowledge repositories into actionable agents that can use current information and initiate actions, from researching a document archive to creating a ticket in the service desk.
Decision-makers find themselves in the middle of a conflicting field of efficiency pressure, skills shortages and increasing regulation. This is precisely where MCP comes in. It reduces integration efforts, accelerates pilots, reduces dependencies on individual providers and creates the basis for verifiable, secure automation. In short: less cabling, more added value.
Business value and ROI: Where does MCP create real benefits?
The classic integration pattern often follows the N-by-M problem: N×M connections are created for N models and M systems, a cost and governance nightmare. MCP breaks this pattern by exposing tools and data sources as reusable MCP servers. Companies invest once in robust, tested connectors and can then use them in different use cases and with different models.
The ROI is reflected in several dimensions.
- Firstly, development costs are reduced because standard components can be used multiple times.
- Secondly , time-to-market is shortened as teams experiment faster and bring successful pilots to production.
- Thirdly, quality and security increase when a controlled, auditable layer bundles the actions of the AI instead of various special solutions.
In practice, it is worth using a decision matrix that evaluates not only license and development costs but also maintenance, security requirements, interoperability and exit costs from a possible vendor lock-in.
Get started with our AI workshop
Architecture at a glance: Host, client, server
MCP clearly separates responsibilities. There are three roles at the center. The host is the higher-level AI application in which the intelligence runs and the orchestration takes place. The client mediates between the host and the external components. The server provides the actual capabilities , from tool functions and resources to dynamic prompts.
This separation allows a clear security architecture: capabilities run in isolation, authorizations are specifically restricted, and communication follows a uniform, lightweight protocol.
The three “primitives” are also important: Tools, Resources, Prompts. These are executable functions with which the AI actions for example, a database query or the creation of a data record. Resources provide context such as files, tickets or structured data views. Prompts control the behavior at runtime, for example by providing guidelines or agent strategies.
Data exchange is based on clearly defined schemes; different channels are possible on the transport side, but the standardization of messages is crucial.
Security, compliance and governance (AI Act, GDPR, liability)
As the ability to trigger actions increases, so do the requirements for security and governance. Three types of risk are particularly relevant:
Firstly, unintentional command execution can occur if inputs are not hardened or a tool has has too far-reaching rights rights. Secondly, there is a risk of prompt and toolinjection-scenarios, in which manipulated content causes the AI to perform undesired actions. Thirdly, there are supply chain risks if an initially trustworthy server changes as a result of an update.
The countermeasures are well known, but must be implemented consistently in the MCP world. Tools should be strictly controlled authorizations and run in sandboxes where appropriate. Every action that has an impact outside the system requires traceable logging and, depending on criticality, a release instance.
Technical controls are supplemented by clear processes: Roles and responsibilities (RACI), dual control principle for sensitive changes, change gates and periodic reviews.
For the GDPR, MCP means that data flows become visible, purposes are clearly defined and a basis is created for data protection impact assessments and the mapping of transfer paths. The AI Act requires additional documentation, risk management and monitoring depending on the risk class. MCP helps to provide this evidence along clear interfaces.
MCP in comparison: Proprietary function calling, classic APIs and RAG
Proprietary function calls from individual model providers are quickly ready to go, but become more difficult to maintain with each additional system and make it more difficult to switch providers.
MCP counters this with an open, model-agnostic standard that decouples capabilities and makes them reusable. Classic API integrations remain important, but MCP creates the orchestration level that makes APIs consistently usable and governance centralized.
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Retrievalaugmented generation, RAG for short, addresses the knowledge gap by loading relevant documents into context. MCP complements this by not only reading, but also acting: It can live data retrieve live data, initiate workflows and feed back results.
In mature architectures, both approaches work together. RAG provides resilient context, MCP orchestrates actions in systems, a combination that is equally convincing in knowledge work and operational processes.
Integration patterns in typical DACH stacks
Many IT landscapes in the region are characterized by Windows clients, Microsoft 365 and Azure services. MCP can be established here as a neutral layer that uses identities and authorizations from the existing directory service and separates workloads cleanly.
The same applies to SAP-related scenarios in purchasing, logistics or finance: MCP servers encapsulate the respective domain logic and only provide the tools that are actually needed. Data and dev stacks benefit when repositoriesdatabases, file systems or collaboration platforms are uniformly exposed.
It is crucial that the organization maintains a curated registry of shared servers, including versioning, release process and operational responsibility.
Interim solution for AI needed?
Prioritized use cases for SMEs and corporations
Self-service analysis is a proven way to get started. Departments are given the opportunity to automate recurring evaluations in accordance with the rules without creating new shadow interfaces.
In operations and procurement, approval workflows, order checks or supplier communication can be relieved by the AI triggering targeted system actions via MCP.
In software development, an engineering assistant increases productivity: Pull-requests pull requests, initiate tests, generate release notes, all traceable and secure.
In knowledge work scenarios, MCP servers combine documents, CRM data and ticket systems into a standardized workflow that combines search, read and action steps.
Team, skills and tooling
The introduction does not require a major project, but clear roles. A Product Owner for AI is responsible for the objectives, prioritization and stakeholder management. SecOps and Platform-Define teams Guardrails, Sandboxing-strategies and Observability.
The applicationsteams provide the domain logic and test along real processes. On the developer side, solid knowledge of a common language such as TypeScript or Python, supplemented by an understanding of secure interfaces, authentication and protocol design.
Telemetry, structured logs and dashboards are mandatory for operation so that execution paths, errors and releases can be traced seamlessly.
Risks and countermeasures
Latency and reliability are perennial technical issues. Anyone who queries many remote servers needs caching strategies and timeouts without losing up-to-dateness. Versioning becomes a Governance-question: What changes are made to a server, who is responsible, how is the rollback carried out? the rollback?
Operationally, it is important to prevent shadow tools. A curated registry, simple application for new capabilities and regular reviews reduce the urge to bypass the MCP to integrate past the MCP.
In legal terms, data transfers must be documented and evaluated: international transfers, purpose limitation and retention periods are particularly relevant. All of these aspects can be addressed in an MCP architecture if the organization clarifies responsibilities, audit trails and operating processes from the outset.
Performance measurement and KPIs
Value is evident in everyday life. It is measurable through time savings in recurring processes, higher throughput per team member and falling error rates. At platform level, this includes the use of shared servers, the average execution time per tool call and the costs per process.
Security and compliance KPIs complete the picture, such as the rate of successfully validated approvals, the time it takes to close an incidents and the completeness of audit trails.
It is important not to maintain the key figures as an end in themselves, but to regularly check them against the original business objectives.
Practical example "Apollo": AI securely accesses GraphQL APIs via MCP
Theory is one thing, but what are the concrete benefits of MCP in everyday life? The following practical example from Apollo ‘s AI tech stack shows what is important when it comes to implementation.
Initial situation
Development teams wanted to connect AI functions directly to their operational GraphQL backends connect. Individual wrappers (e.g. with frameworks such as LangChain), however, caused high maintenance effort and inconsistencies across services. Apollo addressed this problem and published an MCP server that provides a standardized interface for AI systems such as Claude or GPT.
Solution
With the Apollo MCP Server are GraphQL-operations as MCP tools exposed. Teams can choose to provide predefined operations as tools or create a Introspection-mode mode, which offers the agent two generic tools: schema (provides schema context) and execute (executes authorized operations).
The server supports STDIO and serverSent Events (SSE) as transport layers and can be used with the MCP Inspector locally. It is implemented in Rust and is available as an open source project including a Docker image.
Explanation
The approach shifts the integration from the application level to a reusable reusable MCP server layer. Instead of maintaining separate bridges for each use case, teams define one-off tools/operations that can then be used by any MCP-capable AI client.
This reduces N×M cablingfacilitates governance (rightsscoping, approvals, audits) and accelerates the Timeto-valuebecause new workflows are only curated on the tool side.
Parallel adoption steps in the ecosystem, including Microsoft’s announcements on MCP support in agent platforms and Windows environments, show that MCP is gaining breadth as a standard.
Lesson Learned:
- Standardization beats special solutionsWhoever performs AI actions via an MCP server encapsulates, gains speed and control at the same time. For sensitive domains, we recommend starting with predefined operations (least privilege, clear audits).
- Introspection/Execute is suitable for explorative scenarios, but then with narrow authorizations, user confirmation for high-risk steps and clean logging.
- The operational advantage lies less in the “next model” and more in the robust integration layerthat makes AI agents safe and reproducible.
Conclusion
The Model Context Protocol is not another hype term, but a pragmatic answer to a real architectural problem. It reduces integration costs, accelerates value creation and makes AI-supported automation verifiable. If you take security, compliance and operation seriously from the outset, MCP creates a resilient foundation for Agentik without getting bogged down in proprietary individual solutions.
At the same time, MCP addresses key challenges that have so far prevented many companies from deploying production-ready AI: a lack of contextual depth, difficult-to-control execution paths and high technical debt due to specialized solutions. Thanks to its open, modular architecture, MCP becomes a strategic lever, not only for getting started with AI automation, but also for long-term scalability across different teams, use cases and model providers.
For decision-makers, this means that investing in an MCP-capable architecture early on not only strengthens their own innovative power, but also creates the prerequisites for audits, AI governance and regulatory verification obligations as defined by the AI Act. Last but not least, MCP reduces vendor lock-in. This is an aspect that is becoming increasingly strategically important in many enterprise roadmaps.
FAQ
No. MCP is an open, model-independent standard. It was initiated by Anthropic, but is designed to work with any LLM provider that is MCP-compatible or implements it.
MCP is particularly useful in data-intensive, structured work areas such as purchasing, operationsIT service, knowledge management or engineering, wherever AI needs to access real processes.
MCP makes access rights, data flows and function calls transparent and documentable. This facilitates the implementation of data protection impact assessments and traceability in accordance with Art. 5 and 30 GDPR.
APIs provide data, MCP orchestrates actions. RAG provides context , MCP executes tasks. MCP therefore complements existing concepts and becomes the overarching control layer for agentic AI.
We recommend starting with a pilot use case with clear objectives, minimal tool selection, a controlled data room and measurement criteria. It is important to involve IT and data protection at an early stage, SecOps and business teams.
You might also be interested in
AI meets SEO: How to make your content visible for ChatGPT, Gemini & Co. generated by Midjourney Generative search is quietly but fundamentally changing the rules of the game. ChatGPT, Gemini and other systems no longer provide classic link lists, they respond directly. Often based on just a few sources
AI officer: tasks, competencies & benefits for companies Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing processes, products and services and is becoming increasingly important in companies across all sectors. An AI officer creates the necessary security for many companies in order to overcoming regulatory and ethical challenges. This article describes in detail